|
CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
MARCH 8, 2010
5:00 P.M.
NOTICE
Any variance which is granted today expires and becomes null and void six months from today unless construction is begun in less than six months from today on the project for which the variance is granted. If construction will not be started within six months from today, the applicant may come back in five months and ask for a six-months extension, which the Board normally grants.
If a variance is denied, as explained in accordance with Section 19-26-8 of the Code of the City of Mountain Brook, the applicant will not be able to refile for a variance for a period of six months.
Any variance which is granted, regardless of the generality of the language of the motion granting the variance, must be construed in connection with, and limited by, the request of the applicant, including all diagrams, plats, pictures and surveys submitted to this Board before and during the public hearing on the variance application
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: FEBRUARY 8, 2010
CARRY OVERS:
II. 3997: Robert Lee & Natalie G. Smith, Jr., owners, request a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow a screened porch to be 9 feet from the side property line (west) in lieu of the required 15 feet. - 4236 Kennesaw Drive
III. 3998: Webster Ray, owner, requests a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow an addition to an existing single family dwelling to match the existing side setback (west) to be 6.4 feet from the side property line (west) in lieu of the required 8 feet.- 18 Winthrop Avenue
NEW CASES:
IV. 3999: Mr. and Mrs. John Holcomb, owners, request a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow the re-construction of, and addition to, an existing attached garage to be 25.2 feet from the rear property line (southeast) in lieu of the required 40 feet - 56 Country Club Boulevard
V. 4000: Joshua and Emily Anderson, owners, request a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling to be 22 feet from the rear property line (southeast) in lieu of the required 35 feet. 144 Peachtree Road
VI. 4001: J. Conner Liles, owner, requests a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow additions and alterations (including a second floor) to match the existing single family dwelling at 9 feet 9 inches from the side property line (southeast corner of the structure) in lieu of the required 12 feet 6 inches. 3505 Mountain Lane
VII. 4002: Dr. Fred Powell, owner, requests a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow the construction of a carport to be 7.6 feet from an existing on-site accessory building in lieu of the required 10-foot separation. 3744 East Fairway Drive
VIII. G&B Enterprises & DMI Management, owner, appeals the determination made by an administrative official of the City of Mountain Brook that the northeast property line (interior, 406.58 feet) of the subject property is a “rear” property line with a required setback of 40 feet instead of being a “side” property line with a required setback of 15 feet. 3301 Cherokee Road
** If the above appeal results in a determination that the subject property line is a “rear” instead of a “side,” then the following variance (Case 4003) is requested; if determined to be a “side,” then the following case is to be withdrawn by the applicant since the proposed construction of a detached garage would then be in conformance with the “side” setback requirement.
IX. 4003: G&B Enterprises & DMI Management, owner, requests a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow the construction of a detached garage (780 square feet and 21 feet high) to be 20 feet from the rear property line (northeast) in lieu of the required 40 feet. 3301 Cherokee Road
X. NEXT MEETING: April 12, 2010
XI. ADJOURNMENT:
|