20 Safest Cities in Alabama: Safest Places to Live in AL

 

View Mobile SiteView BlogView Twitter Feed

Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA)

2016-May-16 BZA Agenda
[Posted 5/5/2016]  

MEETING AGENDA
CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
MAY 16, 2016
PRE-MEETING: (ROOM A106) 4:15 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING: (ROOM A108) 5:00 P.M.
CITY HALL, 56 CHURCH STREET
MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL 35213

______________

 

  1. Approval of Minutes:   April 18, 2016
  2. Case A-15-15:  Merrill Stewart, owner, requests variances from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow a single family dwelling to be 36 feet from the side property line (northeast) and 34 feet from the side property line (southwest), both in lieu of the required 40 feet.  2732 Abingdon Road (Extension: original approval November 16, 2015)
  3. Case A-15-21:  Bryan and Kathleen Boudreaux, owners, request variances from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow an addition to an existing single family dwelling to be 37 feet from the rear property line (southeast) in lieu of the required 40 feet, and to match the existing side setback (southwest) of 14.9 feet in lieu of the required 15 feet. - 87 Fairway Drive (Extension: original approval December 21, 2015)
  4. Case A-16-18:  Mr. and Mrs. Reese Murray, III, owners, request variances from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow a screened porch addition to be 16 feet from the rear property line in lieu of the required 25 feet; and to allow an associated increase in lot coverage from 40.4% to 41.9% in lieu of the maximum allowable lot coverage of 25%   2009 Garden Place Drive.
  5. Case A-16-19:   Mr. and Mrs. Grantland Rice, owners, request variances from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow an addition to a detached garage to match the existing rear setback of 4.8 feet from the rear property line (east) in lieu of the required 40 feet; and to allow the construction of a new single family dwelling which, taken together with the garage addition, will result in a lot coverage of 29% in lieu of the maximum allowable 25%. 
      47 Greenway Road.
  6. Case A-16-20:   Chris and Jane Brakefield, owners, request a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow a new fence to remain as located 20 feet from the secondary front property line (Ashbury Place) in lieu of the required 40 feet
       3133 Overton Road.
  7. Case A-16-21:   TDL Homes, LLC, owners, request a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow the construction of a new single family residence to be 15 feet from the rear property line (west) in lieu of the required 40 feet.     3924 Montevallo Road.
  8. Case A-16-22:   Kenneth Henson Millsap, owner, requests variances from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow the construction of a screened porch and chimney to be 14.7 feet and 13.7, respectively, from the rear property line (east), both in lieu of the required 35 feet.    21 Peachtree Street.
  9. Case A-16-23:   Emily and Samuel Heide, owners, request a variance from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow the construction of an uncovered deck to be 21.3 feet from the secondary front property line (Cambridge Road) in lieu of the required 40 feet.   2600 Heathermoor Road.
  10. Case A-16-24:   C. Laura and Joshua Haralson, owners, request variances from the terms of the Zoning Regulations to allow additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling to be 20 feet from the rear property line in lieu of the required 35 feet, and 11 feet from the side property line (west) in lieu of the required 12.5 feet. - 4 Montrose Circle.
  11. Next Meeting:  June 20, 2016
  12. Adjournment

 

NOTICE

Any variance which is granted today expires and becomes null and void six months from today unless construction is begun in less than six months from today on the project for which the variance is granted. If construction will not be started within six months from today, the applicant may come back in five months and ask for a six-months extension, which the Board normally grants.

Any variance which is granted, regardless of the generality of the language of the motion granting the variance, must be construed in connection with, and limited by, the request of the applicant, including all diagrams, plats, pictures and surveys submitted to this Board before and during the public hearing on the variance application.

Click link below to download the meeting agenda information packet.  Open the downloaded file in Adobe Acrobat to access bookmark and document word search features.
Agenda packet 

back